![]() ![]() ![]() It makes sense to give attribution if you remix or borrow from someone else’s project, I’d consider it courtesy. The ones we have now are good and should obviously be CC0/no license, but once again “preset packs”/”luxury” presets or some artist’s signature sound hand crafted presets could be CC-BY perhaps.ĬC-BY is also where I think a project file’s natural license would be if it’s open. If presets had licenses I think CC-BY would work well here. ![]() I can see sample packs or other kind of “luxury” samples requiring attribution though, maybe. CC-BY:Īny CC-BY samples would have to be darn nice. I’m not saying it’s not possible to get CC0 projects, and it’s great if we have them, but maybe not only CC0? I personally would only release as CC0 if I decided on it from the start, as in, ”I’m gonna make a song for other people to use”. They can use it however they like with no legal issues, sweet! As an artist though (This is hypothetical, as in if I were an artist), I wouldn’t want to give away any serious work. From a user perspective CC0 is the best possible scenario for anything. CC0 would also be suited to presets, but I’m not sure they have any license at the moment? I don’t think it’s an absurd idea that they could/would though. Crediting every person who made a sample you use would quickly get out of hand. I think CC0 is perfectly suited to samples. If anyone knows if it's possible to add spoiler tags or otherwise compress text please let me know. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |